- sodium chlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cysteineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitric oxide donorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.