fertilization · Growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)
25 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 13
The Effect on Young Camellia oleifera of Different Formula Fertilization · 2005
- positive
- no effect
Study on the Growth and Yield of Camellia oleifera and Its Balance Fertilization · 2007
- positive
- positive
Effects of foliar fertilizer on the growth of superior Camellia oleifera grafting plant · 2010
- positive
- positive
Effects of biogas fertilizer application on growth status of Camellia oleifera seedlings · 2011
- positive
The Effect of Fertilization Treatment on Growth of Grafted Seedling in Camellia oleifera · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
Development Status and Problem Analysis of Camellia oleifera Industry in Guilin · 2013
- positive
Effects of different fertilizer types on fruit shape growth of Ganwu clones in Camellia oleifera · 2013
- positive
- positive
Effects of Different Fertilizers on Growth and Output of Camellia oleifera · 2013
- positive
- negative
Effect of Formula Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Camellia oleifera · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of different fertilizer types on growth of young Camellia oleifera · 2015
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.