Paper · 2009

The Effect on Camellia Oleifera Growth and Physiological Characteristic of Different Formula Fertilization

Zhao Zhi-peng

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fertilization is one of important measures to promote plant growth.According to three different fertilizer types and different ratios of N,P,K,with 9 treatments and a comparison group,by adopting the LSD multiple comparion research method on three-year-old Camellia oleifera,this paper analyzes different formula fertilization'effects on Camellia oleifera growth and psysiological characteristics.The results show that the different ratable fertilizer can stimulate the growth of young C.oleifera.Ⅴ,Ⅸ,Ⅲ and Ⅱ four treatments have the influence for diameter,height,crown and young branch in 9 treatments.They are the biggest differences in the content of chlorophyll of Camellia oleifera leaf and NO3-reductase activity simultaneously in Ⅵ、Ⅷ treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different fertilizer ratios stimulated young Camellia oleifera growth.

Taxon
C.oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
different ratable fertilizere0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different ratable fertilizer can stimulate the growth of young C.oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia Oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments V, IX, III and II influenced diameter, height, crown and young branches.

Taxon
Camellia OleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
Ⅴ,Ⅸ,Ⅲ and Ⅱe0
Outcome
diameter,height,crown and young branche0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ⅴ,Ⅸ,Ⅲ and Ⅱ four treatments have the influence for diameter,height,crown and young branch in 9 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia Oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments VI and VIII showed the greatest differences in leaf chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
Treatment
Ⅵ、Ⅷ treatmentse0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll of Camellia oleifera leaf and NO3-reductase activitye0
Direction
biggest differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They are the biggest differences in the content of chlorophyll of Camellia oleifera leaf and NO3-reductase activity simultaneously in Ⅵ、Ⅷ treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–751 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.