Disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)

1. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. TrichodermaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Bacillus subtilisResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. RhizobiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Fusarium oxysporumResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. carbendazimResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. carboxinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. chlorothalonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. metribuzinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. inoculationPositive and negative results18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. loss of functionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. seed treatmentResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. fungicideResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.