Molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)

1. glyphosatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. saflufenacilPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. sodium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
4. RhizobiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. caffeineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. processingPositive and negative results13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. heatResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
17. herbicideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.