Weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)

1. pendimethalinResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. ImazethapyrResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. prometrynResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. PyridateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. metribuzinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. quizalofop-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. densityResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.