Hypera postica · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)

1. lambda-cyhalothrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. lufenuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. heptachlorResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. malathionResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. carbofuranResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. azinphos-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chlordaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. dieldrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. indoxacarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. parathion-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. permethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. insecticidePositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. firePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. infectionResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. grazingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.