Disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)

1. copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. EPTCPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. Ditylenchus dipsaciResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. MatrineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Sinorhizobium melilotiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. boraxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. ethyl acetateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. inoculationPositive and negative results36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. botanicalPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. loss of functionPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. processingPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. salinityPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
23. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. alkalinityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
27. soil waterPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. growing mediumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. pathogen productPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. mycorrhizaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. grazingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. lightResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
39. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
40. overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. phResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
42. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.