proline · Growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)
4 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effects of Glutamine,Proline,and Exogenous Hormones on the Anther Culture of Alfalfa (2008)
increaseProline supplementation benefited callus induction, proliferation and green plantlet differentiation.
The establishment of high frequency regeneration system of alfalfa somatic embryos (2006)no changeProline had no effect on somatic embryo induction and differentiation.
What separates themSituation: in vitro · not statedCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 2
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.