Physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)

1. silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Sinorhizobium melilotiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. irrigationPositive and negative results33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect
6. droughtPositive and negative results20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect
7. salinityPositive and negative results10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. inoculationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.