Quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)

1. amino acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Empoasca fabaeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. Lactiplantibacillus plantarumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Sinorhizobium melilotiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. calcium(2+)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. calmodulin antagonistResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. polysulfurResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. propyzamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. simazineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. heatResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. pollutionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.