- ammoniaResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- potassium carbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tillageResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rotationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.