application · Control · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)

Positive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19401950196019701980199020002010
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 6

  1. Field Testing Candidate Insecticides on Beans and Alfalfa for Control of Mexican Bean Beetle1, Potato Leafhopper2, and Plant Bugs3 in New York State4 · 1970

  2. The Incidence of Aphis fabae Scop. on Spring‐sown Field Beans in South‐east England and the Efficiency of Control Measures · 1977

  3. Effectiveness of late copper and streptomycin sprays for the control of halo‐blight of beans (Pseudomonas phaseolicola) · 1977

  4. Evaluation of certain insecticides against the pest complex of French bean seed crop under field conditions · 1992

  5. INTEGRATED CONTROL OF COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) RUST IN RELATION TO VEGATATIVE GROWTH, POD CHARACTERISTICS AND TOTAL GREEN YIELD · 2010

  6. Anthranilic Diamide Insecticides Delivered via Multiple Approaches to Control Vegetable Pests: A Case Study in Snap Bean · 2016

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

  1. THE BEAN POD BORERS IN PUERTO RICO · 1940

  2. Effectiveness of Benomyl and Benomyl-Folicote Treatments in Reducing Ozone Injury To Pinto Beans · 1972

  3. Trailing Boom on Fungicides Application on Wheat, Bean and Soybean · 2018

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) against other targets

application · control on other organisms