pruning · Nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)
6 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Effects of Age on Sodium Fluxes in Primary Bean Leaves · 1969
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
Rubidium and Potassium Absorption by Bean‐leaf Slices Compared to Sodium Absorption · 1973
- no effect
Fate of nitrate during initial nitrate utilization by nitrogen‐depleted dwarf bean · 1980
- negative
- negative
Effects of Root Pruning on Translocation of Photosynthates inPhaseolus vulgarisL · 1983
- no effect
Transient Depression of Photosynthesis in Bean Leaves During Rapid Water Loss · 1993
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.