pruning · Nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)
11 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 2
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 9
The role of the leaves in the accumulation of nitrogen by wheat during ear development · 1963
- negative
The Pattern of Distribution of Phosphorus and Dry Matter with Time in Spring Wheat · 1979
- negative
EFFECT OF HARVEST TIME AND DRYING METHOD ON QUALITY AND GRADE OF IRRIGATED SOFT WHITE SPRING WHEAT · 1981
- no effect
- no effect
Transport of zinc and manganese to developing wheat grains · 1995
- no effect
- negative
Effect of Different Photosynthesis Organs on the Quality of Wheat Grains after Anthesis · 2009
- negative
Impact of Cutting a Clover Crop on the Nitrogen Supplied to Winter Wheat in an Intercropping System · 2012
- negative
Temporary growth cessation of wheat roots following defoliation · 2024
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.