Abstract
Getting one clip from wheat varieties helps In animal nutrition during winter time and balances C/N ratio in animal feed and increase the economic importance of wheat. Two trials were conducted at Al-Bustan area (west Delta) in 2002/2003 and 2003/2004 growing seasons. Three bread wheat varieties were used: Sids 1, Giza 168 and Gernrnerza 9, and five rates of nitrogen fertilizatior. (50, 75. 100, i25 ~50 kg/fed). Clipping was done after 45 days from sowing at 7 - 10 cm above soil surface The results of the statistical analysts indicated that clipp'ng significantly re, «ceo grain yield from 13.7 to 12 4 and from 14 9 to 139 ardab 1 feddan in the two respective growing seasons in spite of reduction In Yield components was msiqru 'cant In both seasons. Concerning the dry weight of forage production, it dropped off from 0 52 to 0.42 and from 050 to 0.41 ton 1 fed in the two seasons. respectively, when nitrogen rate decreased from 75 kg to 25 kg 1 fed (half amount which used until 45 days) Also, the highest forage dry weight was obtained from Gernrnerza 9 variety in both seasons, whereas Sids 1 gave the lowest production of forage dry weight in both seasons Cutting decreased all chemical composition (except total carbohydrates), wet and dry gluten and farinograph parameters (water absorption, mix:ng time and stability). On the other hand, increasing nitrogen rate Increased protein and 011 contents, flour extraction, wet and dry gluten and stabihty of dough, whereas it decreased ash, fiber and total carbohydrates content and bran extraction The best bread wheat variety was sios 1, due to the highest values 0; protein content flour extraction and stability of dough, followed by Gernmeiza 9 then Grza 1Se
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping significantly reduced grain yield in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- clipp'nge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“clipp'ng significantly re, «ceo grain yield from 13.7 to 12 4 and from 14 9 to 139 ardab 1 feddan in the two respective growing seasons”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping did not significantly reduce yield components.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- SINGLE CLIPPINGt0
- Outcome
- Yield componentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduction In Yield components was msiqru 'cant In both seasons.”
t0“SINGLE CLIPPING ON YIELD COMPONENTS, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, PHYSICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF SOME WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower nitrogen rate reduced forage dry weight in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogen rate decreased from 75 kg to 25 kg 1 fede0
- Outcome
- dry weight of forage productione0
- Direction
- dropped offe0
- Comparator
- 75 kge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the dry weight of forage production, it dropped off from 0 52 to 0.42 and from 050 to 0.41 ton 1 fed in the two seasons. respectively, when nitrogen rate decreased from 75 kg to 25 kg 1 fed”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Gernrnerza 9 had the highest forage dry weight in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Gernrnerza 9e0
- Outcome
- forage dry weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest forage dry weight was obtained from Gernrnerza 9 variety in both seasons”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 1 had the lowest forage dry weight in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Sids 1e0
- Outcome
- production of forage dry weighte0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sids 1 gave the lowest production of forage dry weight in both seasons”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting decreased chemical composition measures except total carbohydrates.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Cuttinge0
- Outcome
- chemical compositione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- except total carbohydratese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cutting decreased all chemical composition (except total carbohydrates)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting decreased wet and dry gluten.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Cuttinge0
- Outcome
- wet and dry glutene0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cutting decreased all chemical composition (except total carbohydrates), wet and dry gluten and farinograph parameters”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting decreased farinograph water absorption, mixing time, and stability.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Cuttinge0
- Outcome
- farinograph parameters (water absorption, mix:ng time and stability)e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cutting decreased all chemical composition (except total carbohydrates), wet and dry gluten and farinograph parameters (water absorption, mix:ng time and stability).”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen increased protein and oil contents.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- increasing nitrogen ratee0
- Outcome
- protein and 011 contentse0
- Direction
- Increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing nitrogen rate Increased protein and 011 contents”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen increased flour extraction, wet and dry gluten, and dough stability.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- increasing nitrogen ratee0
- Outcome
- flour extraction, wet and dry gluten and stabihty of doughe0
- Direction
- Increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing nitrogen rate Increased protein and 011 contents, flour extraction, wet and dry gluten and stabihty of dough”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen reduced ash, fiber, and total carbohydrate content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogene1
- Outcome
- ash, fiber and total carbohydrates contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it decreased ash, fiber and total carbohydrates content and bran extraction”
e1“increasing nitrogen rate Increased protein and 011 contents”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen decreased bran extraction.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrogene1
- Outcome
- bran extractione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it decreased ash, fiber and total carbohydrates content and bran extraction”
e1“increasing nitrogen rate Increased protein and 011 contents”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 1 was ranked the best bread wheat variety for protein, flour extraction and dough stability.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- sios 1e0
- Outcome
- protein content flour extraction and stability of doughe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best bread wheat variety was sios 1, due to the highest values 0; protein content flour extraction and stability of dough, followed by Gernmeiza 9 then Grza 1Se”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →pruning · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
pruning · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →mechanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
450 papers more in this group
See all 454 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.