Physiology: enzyme activity · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)

39 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. aluminium atomResults differ4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. salicylic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. iron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. RhizobiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. molybdenum atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  10. sodium chlorideResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  11. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. cycloheximideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  14. jasmonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. lincomycinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. putrescineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. trisodium phosphateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. lightPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  21. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. fertilizationPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  23. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  24. radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  25. salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  26. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  27. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. nanoparticleResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. resistance inducerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. coldResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  38. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  39. phResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.