- iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- biocharPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nanoparticlePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- resistance inducerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.