- RhizobiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- limeResults differ9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- fertilizationPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mulchingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.