application · Control · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)
8 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 7
- positive
Effect of Fungicide-nutrient Applications on Powdery Mildew Disease and Pod Yield in Pea · 1993
- positive
Broomrape (Orobanche crenata) Control with Imazethapyr Applied to Pea (Pisum sativum) Seed · 1996
- positive
Measuring Root Disease Suppression in Response to a Compost Water Extract · 2013
- positive
- positive
Irrigation periods, broomrape control treatments and the growth performance of pea (Pisum sativum) · 2019
- positive
Pea‐Saving Partners: Bacillus and Pseudomonas Combat Downy Mildew in Pea Crops · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.