Rhizoctonia solani · Vicia faba (faba bean)

1. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. RhizobiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Rhizobium leguminosarumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Trichoderma longibrachiatumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.