- cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- calcium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mercaptoethanolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cobalt atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- RhizobiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.