salinity · Physiology: ion balance · Vicia faba (faba bean)
24 claims from these papers; 5 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
5 citations between these papers: 5 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 14
Effects of Proline and Glycinebetaine on Vicia Faba Responses to Salt Stress · 1999
- negative
- negative
Role of bioinoculants in development of salt-tolerance of Vicia faba plants under salinity stress · 2005
- negative
- negative
- negative
The role of amino acids in improvement in salt tolerance of crop plants · 2010
- negative
- negative
Improvement of plants salt tolerance by exogenous application of amino acids · 2011
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
Physiological effects of Spirulina platensis in salt stressed Vicia faba L. plants · 2018
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.