Weed · Vicia faba (faba bean)

1. ImazethapyrPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. bentazoneResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Zea maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fluazifop-butylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. tillagePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. herbicideResults agree19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. intercroppingResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.