Yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)

136 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. salicylic acidPositive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. manganese atomPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. boron atomPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. Triticum aestivumPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Oryza sativaPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. potassium sulfatePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  7. OrobanchePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  8. SorghumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. metribuzinPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  10. Allium cepaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. Linum usitatissimumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. nickel atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. fertilizationPositive and negative results176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect
  16. applicationPositive and negative results116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  17. intercroppingPositive and negative results73 papers: 59 positive, 14 negative or no effect
  18. phosphorusPositive and negative results68 papers: 63 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  19. irrigationPositive and negative results62 papers: 49 positive, 13 negative or no effect
  20. densityPositive and negative results57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect
  21. otherPositive and negative results39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect
  22. herbicidePositive and negative results38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  23. sowing timePositive and negative results28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect
  24. tillagePositive and negative results21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  25. stagePositive and negative results15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  26. limePositive and negative results14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. pollinationPositive and negative results12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  28. mulchingPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  29. organicPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. micronutrientPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. classPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. insecticidePositive and negative results7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  33. radiationPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  34. cultivation systemPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  35. pruningPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. heatPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  37. trap barrierPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  38. climate sitePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  39. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  40. transplantingPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  41. cover cropPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  42. storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  43. propertyPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.