Yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)

1. x TriticosecaleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. intercroppingPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. densityPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.