botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna mungo (black gram)

Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 claims from these papers.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect200420062008201020122014
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 4

  1. Effect of leaf extract of Leucaena leucocephala on Phaseolus mungo infected by meloidogyne incognita · 2003

  2. Comparative efficacy of pesticides, bio-control agents and botanicals against Meloidogyne incognita-fusarium oxysporum disease complex on Vigna mungo · 2005

  3. Efficacy of Root Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on the Growth Characteristics of Black Gram (Vigna mungo) Treated with Leaf Extract of Magilam (Mimusops elengi) · 2014

  4. Effect of Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo treated with leaf extract of Mimusops elengi · 2015

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

botanical on Vigna mungo (black gram) against other targets

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita on other organisms