Paper · 2015 · Pakistan Journal of Nematology

Effect of Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo treated with leaf extract of Mimusops elengi

C. Azhagumurugan; M. K. Rajan

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of leaf extract of magilam, Mimusops elengi on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting the black gram, Vigna mungo with different inoculums levels (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 egg-masses/plant) with different concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 ppm). The control and treated plants were analyzed for various growth characteristics such as, root and shoot length, fresh and dry weight of root and shoot, leaf area, root gall index and chlorophyll content after 65 days. These growth characteristics found decreased with increasing inoculum levels of egg-masses and increased with increasing concentrations of leaf extract treatment and fresh and dry weight of root and root gall index found increased with increasing inoculum levels of egg-masses and decreased with increasing concentrations of leaf extract treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nematode egg mass inoculum decreased root and shoot length, shoot weights, leaf area and chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
increasing inoculum levels of egg-massese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
growth characteristicse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These growth characteristics found decreased with increasing inoculum levels of egg-masses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing leaf extract concentration increased growth characteristics.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
leaf extractt0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
growth characteristicst0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased with increasing concentrations of leaf extract treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo treated with leaf extract of Mimusops elengi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nematode inoculum increased fresh and dry root weight and root gall index.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
increasing inoculum levels of egg-massese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of root and root gall indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh and dry weight of root and root gall index found increased with increasing inoculum levels of egg-masses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing leaf extract concentration decreased root weights and root gall index.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
leaf extractt0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root gall indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh and dry weight of root and root gall index found increased with increasing inoculum levels of egg-masses and decreased with increasing concentrations of leaf extract treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on the growth characteristics of Vigna mungo treated with leaf extract of Mimusops elengi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–121 · show in text ↑

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.