Disease · Vigna mungo (black gram)

28 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. carbendazimPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Azadirachta indicaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. imidaclopridResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. Trichoderma virideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Ampelomyces quisqualisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. DaturaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. hexaconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. tebuconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. thiaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. trifloxystrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. botanicalPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. applicationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. seed treatmentPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. inoculationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. fungicideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. ipmResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.