Nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)

32 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. zinc atomPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. RhizobiumResults agree19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. sulfur atomResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. molybdenum atomResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. pendimethalinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. zinc sulfateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. ImazethapyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Priestia megateriumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. PseudomonasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. glycinateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. lead atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. phosphono groupResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. potassium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. fertilizationPositive and negative results42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. phosphorusPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. inoculationResults agree24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. applicationResults agree19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. nitrogenResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. herbicideResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. stageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.