Thrips · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)

1. Zea maysPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. imidaclopridResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. SorghumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. SpinetoramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. seed treatmentPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. botanicalResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.