Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)

1. azadirachtinPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
2. novaluronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. chlorantraniliproleResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. cypermethrinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. spinosadResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Beauveria bassianaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. thiamethoxamResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. emamectin benzoateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. flubendiamideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. Gmelina arboreaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. Piper guineenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. botanicalResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. sowing timeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.