Molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)

1. indole-3-acetic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. selenium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. BradyrhizobiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. allopurinolResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. RhizobiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. colchicineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. malathionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. poly(uridylic acid)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. prolineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. processingPositive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
17. inoculationPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. salinityPositive and negative results10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect
20. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. droughtPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
26. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. phPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. uvResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
31. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. lightResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. storageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. rewateringResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.