Nutrient: content · Eucalyptus

1. silicon atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. aluminium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.