Yield · Ocimum basilicum (basil)

35 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sodium chlorideResults differ7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. zinc atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. fertilizationResults differ52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  10. lightPositive and negative results23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  11. inoculationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. irrigationPositive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  13. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. densityPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  15. mulchingPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  16. cultivation systemPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. droughtPositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  18. phosphorusPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. transplantingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. soil waterPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. salinityResults agree14 papers: 0 positive, 14 negative or no effect
  25. nitrogenResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. mycorrhizaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. nanoparticleResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  35. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.