Nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Oryza sativaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Arachis hypogaeaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Vigna unguiculataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationPositive and negative results42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect
6. potassiumPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. firePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. organicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. co2Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.