Weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)

1. atrazinePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. clomazonePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. clethodimPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. mesotrionePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. glyphosateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paraquatResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. ametrynResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. diuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. flumioxazinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. sulfentrazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. intercroppingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.