Disease · Linum usitatissimum (flax)

1. Allium cepaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. molybdenum atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. mancozebResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Nigella sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. fungicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.