Nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. iron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. molybdenum atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. ammonium sulfateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. sulfur atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. alpha-tocopherolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. esculinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. phosphorusPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
17. tillageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.