Organism · Daucus carota (carrot)

1. sulfentrazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. Globisporangium violaeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. imazamoxResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. imazapicResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. mulchingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.