Quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)

35 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. ascorbic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. calcium dichlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. sodium chlorideResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  7. Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. storagePositive and negative results22 papers: 16 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  12. fertilizationPositive and negative results20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  13. processingPositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  14. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  15. nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. coldPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. tillagePositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  18. mulchingPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. densityPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. physical treatmentPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. potassiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. solarizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. humidityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.