Nutrient: content · Apium graveolens

1. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. CCCPResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationPositive and negative results23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. phosphorusPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. organicResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.