Nutrient: content · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)

1. sulfur atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. glycineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Trigonella foenum-graecumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. thioureaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationPositive and negative results14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. inoculationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.