- Gibberellic acidResults differ9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 5 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- salicylic acidPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzospirillumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propiconazoleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlormequat chlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hexaconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thioureaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Calotropis proceraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quizalofop-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results48 papers: 45 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- nanoparticlePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- climate sitePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.