- Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- malathionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- diafenthiuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- spiromesifenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tebuconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.