- Pseudomonas fluorescensPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Glycine maxPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- acibenzolar-S-methylPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma harzianumResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium sativumResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbendazimResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propiconazoleResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Zea maysResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- jasmonic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium cepaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Syzygium aromaticumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hexaconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spiromesifenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tebuconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thiramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cinnamomum verumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Colletotrichum truncatumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- azoxystrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cyantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- diafenthiuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dipotassium hydrogen phosphateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- myclobutanilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results30 papers: 12 positive, 18 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fungicidePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- floodingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- graftingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ipmResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.