Quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers)

1. Allium sativumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. radiationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.