Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

1. TrichodermaPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Bacillus subtilisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Trichoderma virideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Pseudomonas aeruginosaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. seed treatmentPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. pathogen productPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. botanicalResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. biocontrolResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.