Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

32 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. Allium sativumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. mancozebResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. metalaxylResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. 3-aminobutanoic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. azoxystrobinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. fosetyl-AlResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Lysobacter capsiciResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. dimethomorphResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. oxadixylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. sanitationResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  18. botanicalPositive and negative results25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. loss of functionPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. applicationPositive and negative results11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  21. fungicidePositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  23. infectionPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  24. otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. biocontrolPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. mulchingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. transgenicPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.