Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

66 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. spinosadResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. Beauveria bassianaResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. azadirachtinResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. Nesidiocoris tenuisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. pheromoneResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. abamectinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. SpinetoramResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. indoxacarbResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Delta baryonResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. chlorfenapyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. silicon dioxide nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. tracerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. 2-phenylethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. BeauveriaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. Brassica napus var. napusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. Dysphania ambrosioidesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. Phytolacca dodecandraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. Steinernema carpocapsaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. Steinernema yirgalemenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. Tephrosia vogeliiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. Trichoderma afroharzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. Trichogramma pretiosumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. ammoniumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. double-stranded RNAResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. lufenuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. phenthoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. surfactantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. thiamethoxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. tolfenpyradResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. trap barrierResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. ipmResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. lightResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.